Football
Basketball
-
Home
-
Conferences
-
- ACC
- Boston College
- Clemson
- Duke
- Florida State
- Georgia Tech
- Maryland
- Miami
- NCSU
- UNC
- Virginia
- Virginia Tech
- Wake Forest
- Big 12
- Baylor
- Colorado
- Iowa State
- Kansas
- Kansas State
- Missouri
- Nebraska
- Oklahoma
- Oklahoma State
- Texas
- Texas A&M
- Texas Tech
- Big East
- Cincinnati
- Connecticut
- DePaul
- Georgetown
- Louisville
- Marquette
- Notre Dame
- Pittsburgh
- Providence
- Rutgers
- Seton Hall
- South Florida
- St. John's
- Syracuse
- Villanova
- West Virginia
- Big Ten
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Michigan
- Michigan State
- Minnesota
- Northwestern
- Ohio State
- Penn State
- Purdue
- Wisconsin
- SEC
- Alabama
- Arkansas
- Auburn
- Florida
- Georgia
- Kentucky
- LSU
- Mississippi
- Mississippi State
- South Carolina
- Tennessee
- Vanderbilt
-
- Coaches


Comments
Actually the lawsuit is over the usage of SC, not USC. South Carolina legally has the USC logo, but was trying to re-trademark the SC logo as well after they've stopped using it in the 80's. And Southern Cal bitched.
The funny thing is that South Carolina athletic is more valuable and profitable than Southern Cal's.
www.forbes.com/2009/12/22/most...ll_slide_2.html
Forbe's Top 20 most profitable college programs:
1. Texas Longhorns
2. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
3. Pennsylvania State Nittany Lions
4. Nebraska Cornhuskers
5. Alabama Crimson Tide
6. Florida Gators
7. Louisiana State Tigers
8. Ohio State Buckeyes
9. Georgia Bulldogs
10. Oklahoma Sooners
11. Michigan Wolverines
-------- 12. South Carolina Gamecocks --------
13. Tennessee Volunteers
14. Auburn Tigers
-------- 15. Southern California Trojans --------
16. Michigan State Spartans
17. Arkansas Razorbacks
18. Texas A&M Aggies
19. Wisconsin Badgers
20. Oklahoma State Cowboys